Your systems, finally talking to each other.
Two systems that should talk to each other, and don't. Usually because the connector everyone assumed existed doesn't, or exists and only moves three of the eight fields you need. So someone re-keys it, and the two systems drift apart quietly until a customer notices.
This keeps them in step, including where no off-the-shelf connector exists — that part is ordinary engineering rather than a limitation of what the no-code tool happens to support. What separates a working integration from a demo is what it does when one side is down, and that is designed first here rather than last.
How two systems stay in step when one of them fails.
A change in one system is noticed, its fields mapped to whatever the other expects, and written across once, even if the trigger fires twice. If the write lands, both sides are checked to match. If it fails it is retried with a growing gap between attempts, and if it keeps failing a person is told. The change is never silently dropped.
Good fit, and not.
The second list is the useful one. If you recognise yourself in it, say so on the call and we’ll tell you that rather than sell you something.
Good fit if
- Someone re-keys the same information into a second system
- The tool you need to connect has an API, or a database, or exports files
- You've been told it can't be integrated because there's no connector for it
Not a fit if
- The other system has no API, no database access, and no export. There's nothing to build on
- The two systems disagree about what a record even means. Settle that first — no sync fixes it
- You need real-time sync measured in milliseconds. That's a different kind of build
What a build usually looks like.
Descriptions of what we build, not case studies. We have no clients yet, and these are illustrations rather than work delivered for anyone.
A two-way build
Changes flow both directions with a defined winner when both sides edit the same field.
A custom connector build
Talks to the system nothing else supports, and is documented so you aren't dependent on us to change it.
A migration build
Moves history across once, reconciles both sides, and reports what didn't match.
For whoever asks the hard question.
Writes are idempotent, so a retry after a timeout doesn't create a duplicate — the single most common way integrations quietly corrupt data. Failures go to a queue and are retried with a growing gap between attempts; if they keep failing, a person is told rather than the change being dropped. Field mapping is configuration you can read, not logic buried in a script, so a new field doesn't require us.
- Idempotent writes
- The same change sent twice lands once.
- Retry with backoff
- A temporary outage doesn't lose the change.
- Alert on give-up
- When retries are exhausted, a person hears about it. Nothing is silently dropped.
Thirty minutes to find out whether this is worth building.
Usually two to six weeks, depending on the other system. You’ll get a written scope and a fixed price before anything is built, and if it isn’t a fit we’ll say so on the call.
Explore related work